The latest monthly statistics on the number of people with
learning disability and/or autism in specialist inpatient units has been
released today by the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC, see http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB19062
). Six months ago I wrote a blogpost on these inpatient statistics (see http://chrishatton.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/one-step-beyond-what-do-latest.html
). At the time the statistics suggested the number of people in these inpatient
units was not decreasing, but commissioners reported that 37% of people had a
discharge date within the next 6 months. I foolishly wrote that if this
prediction was right, we should see a significant dent in the number of people
in inpatient units in 6 months’ time. What’s happened?
Well, on a nerd point, one big thing that’s happened is that
the HSCIC have continued to try and improve the quality of the data they have.
This leads to some complications when interpreting trends. This graph from the
HSCIC executive summary neatly shows the problem.
The dark blue bars show the number of people in learning
disability inpatient services steadily increasing over time (from 2,445 people
in April 2015 to 2,620 people in October 2015) – this is based on the number of
people that commissioners reported at the time. There are two reasons why this
increase is hard to interpret though.
First, over time more CCGs are getting round to actually reporting
any information to HSCIC (not like it’s a national priority or anything). In
April 2015 the figures were based on returns from 167 commissioners (45
commissioners didn’t provide any information/updates, and 7 commissioners
apparently didn’t have anyone in learning disability inpatient services). By
October 2015, 189 commissioners were submitting information (26 commissioners
still didn’t submit any information that month, and mysteriously the number of
commissioners without anyone in inpatient services had dropped to 4). So – more
commissioners reporting would suggest bigger numbers of people reported to be
in inpatient services over time.
The second issue is in the light blue bars in the graph. As
well as reporting the number of people for that month, commissioners can retrospectively
report people in inpatient services that they didn’t report at the time - presumably
people they’d only just found out about. These numbers are reported in the
light blue bars. For April 2015, this adds 240 people (10%) to the number of
people reported at the time. Each month, more and more retrospective people are
added to the numbers, sometimes from several months back.
This means that we can’t interpret the overall numbers of
people reported with learning disabilities in inpatient services as reducing
over time either. Although the headline numbers drop from 2,685 people in April
2015 to 2,620 people in October 2015, by next April it’s possible that
commissioners will have retrospectively added something in the order of 200-300
people to the October 2015 numbers.
Bearing all these caveats in mind, what is clear is that
there has been no really significant drop in the number of people with learning
disabilities in inpatient units over the past six months.
Most of the rest of the information in the HSCIC data tables
is based on information submitted at the time by commissioners (so the dark
blue line in the graph), which increases over time, so any changes over time
have to interpreted in the light of this general ‘inflator’. Overall, the
pattern is of no real change from April to October 2015, despite Care and
Treatment Reviews and the nascent Fast Track Sites. For example:
·
The number of people aged under 18 in inpatient
services (120 people in April; 135 people in October) – surely a priority?
·
The number of people with neither learning
disabilities nor autism in inpatient services (90 people in April; 105 people
in October) – why?
·
The number of people in inpatient settings that
are not ‘secure’ (1,105 people in April; 1,190 people in October) - which you
might expect would be the first group where you would see a reduction in
numbers?
·
The number of people in inpatient settings that
are not CQC compliant (280 people in April; 275 people in October) – where are
the commissioners?
·
The number of people in inpatient services that
are not subject to the Mental Health Act (305 people in April; 315 people in
October);
·
The average number of days that people had spent
in their current inpatient service (from an average 1,107 days in April to an
average 1,118 days in October – that’s just over three years);
·
The average number of days in total that people
had continuously spent in inpatient services, including transfers between
different units (from an average of 1,894 days in April to an average of 1,942
days in October – that’s well over five years).
There are, however, some trend-buckers (have to be careful
how I say that), all of which are going in the wrong direction:
·
The number of people in inpatient services who
last had a review between 6 months and a year ago (up from 625 people in April
to 965 people in October);
·
Even worse, the number of people in inpatient
services who last had a review over a year ago (up from 30 people in April to a
whopping 475 people in October);
·
The number of people in inpatient services who
are reported to be ‘not dischargeable’ (up from 555 people in April to 655
people in October);
·
The number of people in inpatient services who
do not have a planned transfer date (up from 1,290 people in April to 1,540 people
in October).
There are some other worrying snippets that are hard to
square with the latest NHS England/LDA/ADASS strategy “Building the right
support”, more widely known I think as “Homes not hospitals” (see https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ld-nat-imp-plan-oct15.pdf
).
First, only 575 people in inpatient services in October were
reported to have a plan involving moving to ‘the community’ (this includes
varieties of supported living and living with families), with a further 390
people having a plan to move to residential care. Most of the rest of people with
a transfer plan (and bearing in mind that these plans don’t have to have
discharge dates attached), have a plan to move to another variety of inpatient
service.
Second, the most common ‘diagnostic category’ on admission
to an inpatient unit was reported to be ‘learning disability’ (995 people in
October 2015) – surely this should not be sufficient to get you into an
inpatient unit?
Finally, there were 860 people in October 2015 where the
local authority was not aware of a planned transfer to their local area. This
may be because many people being ‘transferred’ are actually being transferred
to other inpatient services, but it’s worrying in the light of the latest social
care statistics that local authorities only report supporting 490 adults with
learning disabilities in inpatient settings (see http://chrishatton.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/social-care-its-not-complicated-any-more.html
). Despite the LGA/ADASS/NHS England strategy making much of its invitation to
pool budgets across health and social care, a 'transformation fund' and a promise of dowries for those
living in inpatient services for 5 years or more, it’s doubtful to me whether
under the cosh local authorities are going to play.
I fear more Daisies on the horizon, a “home” for people for
whom “living at home is not an option” (see http://www.awp.nhs.uk/news-publications/trust-news/2015/october/new-service-will-bring-vulnerable-adults-back-home-to-wiltshire/
). As the Director of Quality for Wiltshire CCG describes it:
“This innovative service aims to provide
individualised care and support for Wiltshire residents who have a complex
learning disability with a mental health condition or display behaviours that
challenge. This is a local residential setting which will encourage
individuals to maintain their family relationships, build a fulfilled life
through participation in the community and access mainstream services when
required to ensure that their health and social care needs are met.” (see http://www.wiltshireccg.nhs.uk/news/new-learning-disabilities-service-to-launch-in-wiltshire
)
This is a nine-bedded ‘home’ being built in the grounds of a
psychiatric hospital in Devizes, pretty central in the county but still three-quarters of an hour by car from the
county town, Salisbury (going by public transport will take you an hour and a
half, if you’re lucky). It’s called Daisy because its floor plan looks like a
daisy, as can clearly be seen here.
I have nothing else to say.
I like this post because it is informative and helpful to all readers. I would like to revisit this post. Please Visit:
ReplyDeleteAccountant Boynton Beach
Accountant Lighthouse point
Hi! Your blog is awesome and inspiring :) I drop by just to say hello and thinking maybe you could help me with my problem... Here it is: I need to find a suitable nursing home for my aunt. She's getting old and we can't take care of her anymore. We really want the best for her but that is not achievable if she is still at home being taken care of by our maid.. I've been looking through http://www.webbline.com/nursing-homes/ as this site is helpful in some ways to my dilemma but I need a real nurse to tell me what to do or what's the best solution... Can you please help me out? Thanks a lot!
ReplyDelete