In her first blogpost as the new NHS England Director of
Transformation – Learning Disabilities (see https://www.england.nhs.uk/learningdisabilities/2016/04/19/julie-higgins-2/
), Dr Julie Higgins reported that the number of people in specialist learning
disability inpatient units has started to fall, apparently from 2,795 people in
March 2015 to 2,615 people in March 2016 (a reduction of 6.4%).
Obviously, this is an abiding preoccupation of the
Transforming Care programme, and a question which I’ve returned to in this blog
roughly every 6 months to check in on what’s happening. Is the tide really
beginning to turn? Trying to answer this simple question is surprisingly
difficult, for the reasons I outlined here 6 months ago (http://chrishatton.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/impatient-inpatient.html
).
Basically, the Health and Social Care Information Centre
(HSCIC) collect information at the end of every month from commissioners of
these services (at the last count there were 219 possible commissioners of
inpatient services in England – see http://www.hscic.gov.uk/article/6328/Reports-from-Assuring-Transformation-Collection
). Commissioners report how many people are in inpatient services at the end of
the relevant month (and a whole host of other information about them too). However commissioners might not know about everyone at the time, so in later
months’ returns they can add in information on people they didn’t know about at
the time of their original report. So the number of people commissioners report
can go up retrospectively (as they find out about more people admitted to
inpatient services that they didn’t know about), and the number can
theoretically also go down (if they find out that people have been discharged
that they assumed at the time were still in an inpatient service).
As if this didn’t induce enough wobbliness in the reporting,
all commissioners don’t reliably report their numbers every month. In April
2015 only 167 commissioners submitted information; by April 2016 this was 193.
This might mean that the overall number of people reported to be in inpatient
services goes up over time, as more commissioners provide information. It also
means that as new commissioners report information for the first time (or after
a gap of a few months), great wodges of retrospective information can bump up
the numbers of people in inpatient services in previous months as well as in
the month when they start reporting.
Given all this retrospective reporting, what (if anything)
can we conclude about what’s happening to the number of people with learning
disabilities in specialist inpatient units? To get some idea of this, we need
to get a handle on the number of people being added by commissioners
retrospectively. Without knowing this, comparing information from March 2015
(with 12 months’ worth of added retrospective information) to information from
March 2016 (which just has information reported for that month without any
retrospective additions) might not be very meaningful.
[I’m hoping that this makes some sort of sense so far?]
Well, first, looking at the deepest purple bars, it looks
like the initial reporting of the number of people with learning disabilities
increased from April 2015 (2,445 people) to October 2015 (2,620 people), probably
as the number of commissioners reporting information increased. After that
(when the number of commissioners remains consistently fairly high) the number
of people initially reported by commissioners drops very slightly from October
2015 (2,620 people) to April 2016 (2,565 people).
If we’ve got a stable, high number of commissioners
reporting, does this mean that the initial reporting of numbers of people will
more closely reflect the total number of people in inpatient services? Does
this mean we can start to claim a (very gradual) drop in the number of
inpatient service places for people with learning disabilities? Looking at the
retrospective data, I think the answer is ‘not yet’.
In the information for April 2015, a total of 320 people
have been added retrospectively, 130 in the first three months after initial
reporting (and the numbers for April 2015 are not completely stable even a year
on). In January 2016 (when the number of commissioners reporting was already
high), 115 people were still being added by commissioners in the first three
months after initial reporting, with presumably more to be added in the future.
I think this means we can’t take the 2,565 people initially
reported in April 2016 as a final figure. Based on previous numbers being
reported retrospectively, even with a nearly full complement of commissioners,
I think we can expect well over 100 people to be added to this total. This
would put the April 2016 total (something like 2,700 people) well within 100
people of the April 2015 total of 2,765 people.
Compared to the stated aims of
Transforming Care, it feels (to steal a phrase) that we’re still waiting for
the great leap forwards (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjLXyqD3lvI
).
PS: The sign in the photo is on a road up and out of
Heversham, a village near me, which does indeed have a house called Fluster Gap
at the top of the hill.