To accompany the #7daysofaction campaign, I’m going to try
and write some very short blogposts looking at recent trends in what’s
happening with learning disability inpatient services in England. This one
looks at trends over a 10-year time period in the overall number of people in learning
disability inpatient services, and the balance of NHS vs independent sector services
over this time.
To do this, I’m using information from the Health and Social
Care Information Centre Learning Disability Census, which ran annually from
2013 to 2015 and asked providers of specialist learning disability inpatient
services in England lots of questions about their services and who was in them
on the Census date (30th September). The latest reports for the 2015
Census have lots of useful information on trends from 2013 to 2015 (see here http://www.hscic.gov.uk/searchcatalogue?productid=19718&q=learning+disability+census+2013&sort=Most+recent&size=100&page=1#top
and http://www.hscic.gov.uk/searchcatalogue?
The method for the Learning Disability
Census was based on an earlier census of inpatient mental health services in
England, called Count Me In, which from 2006 to 2010 also included inpatient services
for people with learning disabilities. Very little information on people with learning
disabilities was published in the Count Me In reports, but an IHaL report by
Gyles Glover and Valerie Olson in 2012 provided a more comprehensive analysis
of this information (see https://www.improvinghealthandlives.org.uk/publications/1161/A&T_and_other_specialist_inpatient_care_for_people_with_LD_in_the_Count-Me-In_census
).
With some gaps, this gives us some
information on specialist learning disability inpatient services in England,
and the people with learning disabilities in them, at regular snapshots from
2006 to 2015.
The graph below shows the number
of people in learning disability inpatient services in England from 2006 to
2015, according to whether they were in an NHS unit or an independent sector
unit. Overall, the number of people with learning disabilities in inpatient
units in England has dropped from 4,609 people in 2006 to 3,000 people in 2015,
with earlier (and bigger) reductions reflecting the tail-end of ‘regular’
deinstitutionalisation – the eventual closure of the last ‘long-stay’ hospital
campuses. [As an aside, it’s worth remembering that these campuses also required
a real concerted push to get them closed, against considerable institutional
inertia].
Reflecting this, the number of people
with learning disabilities in NHS inpatient services dropped, from 3,669 people
in 2006 to 1,650 people in 2015. In contrast, the number of people with
learning disabilities in independent sector NHS services increased, from 940
people in 2006 to 1,350 people in 2015. In 2006, 20% of people were in independent
sector services; in 2015 this had increased to 45%.
This blogpost isn’t going to be a
paean to the virtues of the NHS – with #JusticeforLB how could it be? – and good
or shockingly bad services are not the exclusive property of any organisational
arrangement. #JusticeforLB is exposing how NHS services can be as rapacious and
resistant to accountability as any imagined cigar-chomping venture care
capitalist (an outdated stereotype now – maybe a desiccated smooth-suited
coconut water drinking capitalist?).
But independent sector services
operate to different (relaxed or absent) rules compared to the public sector –
not least in terms of freedom of information legislation. In theory, the independent
sector is also even less bound to general policy priorities than NHS services,
and as profitable businesses are not in the business of closing themselves down
– although if it no longer turns a profit, they can close themselves down at
the flip of a coin without any thought to the people within those services.
As the ‘structure’ of health care in
England becomes more and more like a Jackson Pollock painting, this drift
towards the independent sector is likely to be the result of hundreds of local
(possibly panicked) decisions being made all around the country by
commissioners, NHS services and NHS England, rather than the desired outcome of
a national plan. But is this drift going to be (yet another) obstacle in the
path to closing these services?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.