Friday, 22 May 2015

One Step Beyond: What do the latest statistics tell us about inpatient services and people with learning disabilities?


The Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) have today (22nd May) published two updates of statistics about people with learning disabilities in inpatient services in England. Both of these updates are based on information from English NHS commissioners, and are re-booted updates in a series previously published by NHS England.

The first update contains a range of information on the number of people in learning disability inpatient services from February to March 2015 (it’s not information for a full three months because the responsibility for collecting the information moved from NHS England to HSCIC in January). It’s available here http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB17638/lds-1415q4-rep.pdf

The second update contains similar information (in less detail) on a month-by-month basis, reporting on the month of April 2015. This is available here http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB17634/ldsm-apr-15-exec.pdf

There is more detail in both of them than I’m going to mention here, and I would recommend spending a bit of time looking at both updates if this is important to you. There are a few things that jumped out at me, mainly because they suggest that, as yet, large-scale reductions in the use of inpatient services are just not happening.

First, the headline figures: the number of people in learning disability inpatient services. I found this graph from the monthly update the most helpful: ignoring the blip in January 2015 (probably due to the transfer of data-gathering responsibilities) the picture is of a consistent number of people in these services from March 2014 to April 2015 (in fact the number of people went up slightly from March to April).



Second, the population of people in these inpatient services is pretty static. During February and March 2015, only 25 people had gone into and come out of a specialist service in that time, a further 105 people had been admitted and 180 people had been discharged. When admissions and discharges can be include transfers between different inpatient services, a lot of the admissions and discharges are likely to be people being churned around the inpatient system. Even when just looking at how long people had been in their current inpatient service, nearly half (47%) of people had been in their current inpatient service for more than 2 years.

Third, there seems to be little evidence that inpatient services are sharpening up their act in terms of what might be obvious priorities. So at the end of March 2015:
·        there were still 110 people aged under 18 in inpatient services,
·        there were 90 people in learning disability inpatient services recorded as having neither a learning disability nor autism,
·        there were 285 people in inpatient services not under the Mental Health Act,
·        almost a quarter of people (22%) had not been reviewed in the last six months,
·        half of people (50%) still had no planned transfer date,
·        for almost half of people (48%), their planned transfer date was more than a year away,
·        the above statistic might partly explain why local authorities were apparently not aware of the transfer of 755 people (32%).

Given that a large majority (79%) of people are in general or low secure inpatient services, what are the apparent blockages to moving people out of inpatient services? According to people’s “care plans”, of the 1,480 people “needing inpatient care”: 510 people (21%) are “not dischargeable”, 945 people (39%) have an “active treatment plan”, and only 25 people (1%) require “indefinite inpatient care”.

This leaves 915 people (over a third of people in inpatient units, 38%) currently in inpatient services who “do not need inpatient care” according to their care plans, with 830 people “working towards discharge” and 85 having a “delayed transfer of care”. This number of people roughly corresponds to the 37% of people with a planned discharge date in the next 6 months, so if this cohort moves out of inpatient services (and is not replaced by new people) it should become visible in these statistics in the next 6 months.



Overall, while there improvements in what commissioners say they and providers are doing (for example in the number of people with plans to move out of inpatient units), as yet there is very little evidence that this is resulting in more people moving out of inpatient services, of fewer people moving in, and of inpatient services really changing what they’re doing. I also worry whether a cohort of 'easier' people are preparing to move out, with everyone else being prepared to be left where they are as 'undischargeable'. Let’s hope they are collectively feeling the heat from NHS England, to take One Step Beyond (see, I got there in the end – enjoy this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-uyWAe0NhQ ).

4 comments:


  1. "Imagine a country where the history of your people is told twice: once by your family and community, then again by your school and society."

    As a working class pakeha, this is the country I live in.

    My family and community tells a struggle of resistance against capitalism and working class solidarity. My school and society tells a story of lazy bludgers who deserve to be poor.
    ALOKA UST-5546

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very well written and informative article, thank you :-)
    Toshiba PVT-375BT

    ReplyDelete

  3. post…. I enjoyed reading your informative article and considering the points
    TOSHIBA PVM-375AT

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great work, Chris. I understand that there is no financial incentive for Trusts to have empty inpatient beds, as if there is no one in them, they will not get paid. Might this, in part, be behind this very disappointing state of inertia.

    ReplyDelete