News of the potential effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines has started to focus attention on priorities – as batches of the vaccine become available, who should be prioritised to get them first? This post sets out some of the evidence that, to my mind at least, builds a case for people with learning disabilities being a much higher priority for COVID-19 vaccinations than is currently being suggested.
What is the current suggested priority list for the COVID-19
vaccination? Here is the
most recent interim advice from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation
(JCVI), published in September:
“This interim ranking
of priorities is a combination of clinical risk stratification and an age-based
approach, which should optimise both targeting and deliverability. A
provisional ranking of prioritisation for persons at-risk is set out below:
- · older adults’
resident in a care home and care home workers
- ·
all those
80 years of age and over and health and social care workers
- ·
all those
75 years of age and over
- ·
all those
70 years of age and over
- ·
all those
65 years of age and over
- ·
high-risk
adults under 65 years of age
- ·
moderate-risk
adults under 65 years of age
- ·
all those
60 years of age and over
- ·
all those
55 years of age and over
- ·
all those
50 years of age and over
- ·
rest of
the population (priority to be determined)”
As you can see, this is heavily weighted towards older
people aged 65 or over. Using
ONS 2019 population estimates, this would mean that over 10 million people
aged over 65 in England (and a majority of the 600,000 care
and nursing home workforce who will be working with older people) would get
COVID-19 vaccinations before anyone aged under 65, no matter what their risks
of dying from COVID-19.
This is going to be a serious problem for people with
learning disabilities.
The
recent authoritative Public Health England analysis of COVID-19 deaths amongst
people with learning disabilities in the first wave of the pandemic
reported rates of death 3-6 times higher amongst people with learning
disabilities compared to people generally. These rates of death become even
more disproportionate at younger (adult) ages, with a peak age of COVID-19
deaths at age 55-64. The PHE analysis of LeDeR notifications suggests that COVID-19
death rates for people with learning disabilities aged 55-64 are higher than
death rates for the general population aged 75+, and much higher than death
rates for the general population aged 65-74 (see the graph below, copied from
the PHE report). COVID-19 death rates for every age group of adults with learning
disabilities aged 35 years upwards (35-44; 45-54; 55-64) are higher than
general population COVID-19 death rates for people aged 65-74, who are a higher
priority for vaccination.
Going down the vaccination priority list, once the 10
million+ people aged 65 or over and care/nursing home workers for older people
have been vaccinated, the next priorities are people aged under 65 who are ‘high
risk’, then people aged under 65 who are ‘moderate risk’.
I’m assuming that people defined as ‘high risk’ are in one
of the ‘clinically extremely vulnerable’ groups used in the
18th November government guidance on shielding. The full list in
the guidance is here:
“Adults with the
following conditions are automatically deemed clinically extremely vulnerable:
- ·
solid
organ transplant recipients
- ·
those with
specific cancers:
- o
people
with cancer who are undergoing active chemotherapy
- o
people
with lung cancer who are undergoing radical radiotherapy
- o
people
with cancers of the blood or bone marrow such as leukaemia, lymphoma or myeloma
who are at any stage of treatment
- o
people
having immunotherapy or other continuing antibody treatments for cancer
- o
people
having other targeted cancer treatments that can affect the immune system, such
as protein kinase inhibitors or PARP inhibitors
- o
people who
have had bone marrow or stem cell transplants in the last 6 months or who are
still taking immunosuppression drugs
- ·
those with
severe respiratory conditions including all cystic fibrosis, severe asthma and
severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- ·
those with
rare diseases that significantly increase the risk of infections (such as
severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), homozygous sickle cell disease)
- ·
those on
immunosuppression therapies sufficient to significantly increase risk of
infection
- ·
adults
with Down’s syndrome
- ·
adults on
dialysis or with chronic kidney disease (stage 5)
- ·
pregnant
women with significant heart disease, congenital or acquired
- ·
other
people who have also been classed as clinically extremely vulnerable, based on
clinical judgement and an assessment of their needs. GPs and hospital
clinicians have been provided with guidance to support these decisions”
You will notice that adults with Down syndrome are on this
list, presumably because of recent research reporting
more people with Down syndrome than other people with learning disabilities are
dying of COVID-19. For some health conditions on this list, particularly for
those aged under 65, people
with learning disabilities are more likely to experience them than other people,
including severe respiratory conditions and chronic kidney disease.
Going down to the next priority level for COVID-19
vaccination, those at ‘moderate risk’, again people
with learning disabilities aged under 65 are more likely than other people to experience
a range of the health issues in the
‘moderate risk’ list below, including: lung conditions, heart disease,
diabetes, chronic kidney disease (yes I know it appears in both lists – I’m not
the person to ask why this is), and being very overweight.
“People at moderate
risk from coronavirus include people who:
- ·
are 70 or
older
- ·
have a
lung condition that's not severe (such as asthma, COPD, emphysema or
bronchitis)
- ·
have heart
disease (such as heart failure)
- ·
have
diabetes
- ·
have
chronic kidney disease
- ·
have liver
disease (such as hepatitis)
- ·
have a
condition affecting the brain or nerves (such as Parkinson's
disease, motor neurone disease, multiple sclerosis or cerebral palsy)
- ·
have a
condition that means they have a high risk of getting infections
- ·
are taking
medicine that can affect the immune system (such as low doses of steroids)
- ·
are very
obese (a BMI of 40 or above)
- ·
are
pregnant”
We don’t know how many adults with learning disabilities
aged under 65 are experiencing one or more of these ‘moderate risks’ (as people
often have more than one health issue), and we also know very little about how
health issues commonly experienced by people with learning disabilities (such
as constipation, gastro-intestinal reflux and dysphagia, which can all be
implicated in aspiration pneumonia for example) relate to risk of serious consequences
of COVID-19.
So, as I understand it the current COVID-19 vaccination
priority list will first get through well over 10 million vaccinations of
people aged over 65 (which will include only 13,000 older adults with learning
disabilities registered with GPs) and care/nursing home workers working with older
people. Only then, through complex processes of gatekeeping, will adults aged
under 65 with learning disabilities who are ‘clinically extremely vulnerable’
(an uncertain but likely fairly small proportion of people aged under 65 with
learning disabilities) get the COVID-19 vaccine, as part of the
approximately 1 million people in England aged under 65 who are on the shielded
patient list.
And it is only after vaccinating approximately 12 million people
will adults with learning disabilities aged under 65 at ‘moderate risk’ be
vaccinated, involving even more complicated and uncertain gatekeeping, and where
there are likely to be larger proportions of people aged under 65 with learning
disabilities but still missing a lot of people with relevant health issues.
So, in summary I think this priority list for COVID-19
vaccinations will vaccinate over 10 million older people and care workers first,
which will only include around 13,000 older adults with learning disabilities. At
this point the vaccination process will have missed 95% of adults with learning
disabilities registered with GPs, even though death rates from COVID-19 for younger
adults with learning disabilities from 35 years upwards are higher than those
for the general population aged 65-74. Once the vaccination priority process moves
on to adults aged under 65, the focus on the ‘clinically extremely vulnerable’ then
those at ‘modest risk’ will involved complicated and inefficient gatekeeping,
and will still miss large numbers of adults with learning disabilities with
health conditions potentially putting them at risk. And this is before we even
start thinking about the potential mental and physical health consequences of
continued lockdowns and restrictions for people with learning disabilities and
those who support them, whether family or paid workers.
My proposal is really straightforward. As
with flu vaccinations now (and I know COVID-19 is definitely not flu, but many of the
risk factors for people with learning disabilities are similar), put adults with
learning disabilities of all ages (registered with GPs if you need an institutional
peg) as one of the most urgent priorities for COVID-19 vaccinations. In total
this would be around 250,000 people known to GPs in England, a fairly small
population in the grand scheme of what is being proposed with vaccinations, and
working through GP registrations there is an infrastructure there to find people without the need for complicated gatekeeping. An equal priority for vaccination
would be people who are in regular, close contact with the person, including
family (many of whom are likely to be in current high priority vaccination
categories anyway) and paid workers supporting people. As well as saving lives
amongst a group of people who already get a raw deal from health services and
have been disproportionately hit by COVID-19, just think what a difference it
will make to people being able to live their lives when restrictions and
lockdowns may have taken a real toll.
thanks you again Chris. Have sent to my MP to add to my previous letter about the Social Care Taskforce recommendations. A quick win to adopt this, I'd say, you make an excellent argument
ReplyDelete