This blogpost is the third of four looking at the
Transforming Care programme through the prism of the national statistics
regularly produced by the ever excellent @NHSDigital, and updating a series of
blogposts I wrote towards the end of 2017 on the same issues.
The first blogpost looked at statistics on the number of people being admitted to inpatient services, and where they were being admitted
from.
The second blogpost looked at when people were in inpatient units, how far were they from home and how long were they staying in inpatient
services.
This blogpost will focus on what the statistics are telling
us about planning within inpatient services, just using statistics from
Assuring Transformation. As Transforming Care moves towards a close (or not), its
effects should be felt through the inpatient care plans people have, whether
people’s needs are being regularly reviewed, and whether people are having
regular, effective Care and Treatment Reviews (CTRs).
The first graph below shows the details of care plans for
people according to inpatient services, from March 2015 through to September
2018. By September 2018, almost a third of people (31%) were labelled ‘not
dischargeable’, up 10% from 21% in March 2015. The proportion of people with an
active treatment plan but no plan to leave has stayed pretty static over time
(41% of people in September 2018). The proportion of people actively working
towards a plan to leave with a plan in place has dropped over time, from over a
third (35%) in March 2015 to under a quarter (23%) in September 2018. Delayed
transfers of care have gradually crept up over time, and are now standing at 5%
of people in September 2018. From these figures, it is impossible to tell
whether these changes are due to changes in what inpatient services are doing,
or changes in who is in inpatient services. For example, if Transforming Care
is being effective in supporting ‘dischargeable’ people (nice phrase) to leave
inpatient services, then the proportion of ‘undischargeable’ people (even nicer
phrase) left in inpatient services will go up.
But it does mean that, towards the end of Transforming Care, there are well over a quarter of people (28% in September 2018) in inpatient services when, according to their care plans, they don’t need to be there.
But it does mean that, towards the end of Transforming Care, there are well over a quarter of people (28% in September 2018) in inpatient services when, according to their care plans, they don’t need to be there.
For everyone in inpatient services, reviews should happen regularly. The graph below shows how long ago people in inpatient services had had their last review, from March 2015 to September 2018. The graph generally shows that things seemed to get worse in 2016 but improved again in 2017 and was maintained through 2018. By September 2018, well over a quarter of people (29%) had had a review in the past 12 weeks, and almost a quarter (23%) between 12 weeks and 6 months ago. However, almost a further quarter (22%) last had a review between 6 months and a year ago, and another 23% had last had a review over a year ago.
The graph below shows when people are next scheduled to have
a CTR. Again, there are improvements from October 2016 to September 2018, where
the proportion of people with no scheduled future CTR dropped from over half
(55%) to around one in six people (17%). For a further 15% of people in September
2018 the date for their scheduled CTR had passed without a CTR happening, a
proportion that is gradually creeping up.
Overall there are signs that more people in inpatient
services are having both regular reviews and Care and Treatment Reviews. There
are still large numbers of people in inpatient services who have not had any
sort of review for a long time, however, and there are still well over a
quarter of people in inpatient units whose care plan says they don’t need to be
there.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.